Posted: Wed May 04, 2005 3:27 pm
Not hot enough 

Welcome to NewsOnF1 Forums where you can chat about anything Formula 1
https://www.newsonf1.net/forum/
friday? saturday?Ed wrote:Weather forecast updated.
Latest: Sunday 22 with showers!
I disagree, I have written a post about Montoya and why his talent is to an extent not suited to F1, as it is currently regulated. I am not going to repeat that at every race.julian mayo wrote:Graham Ross wrote:K-D I have to agree with sgd here
The verdict is still out. Maybe Montoya is harder on tryes but Raikkonen is harder on the car. Which is better ?
Montoya has only raced for 2 races so you cannot tell for sure
And I reckon Montoya will beat Raikkonen this year
(sgd is being very reasonable![]()
)
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
and SGD is being VERY reasonable
I hope ED your forecast is true and it does rainEd wrote:Weather forecast updated.
Latest: Sunday 22 with showers!
K-D, you like the word clearly don't you!K-D wrote:I personally have no doubt that Kimi is clearly a better F1 driver than Juan Pablo.
You clearly state Barrichello and Fisichella won't contend for the championship but in fact have Montoya as a candidate. And in your blurb about McLaren you don't mention anything about one being clearly better than the other.K-D wrote:.... The contenders in 2005 will be:
Michael Schumacher
Kimi Raikkonen
Juan Pablo Montoya
Fernando Alonso
I will be VERY surprised if any other drivers make a real push for the championship, with the relative weakness that I suspect Ferrari will have in 2005, there is no way that Rubens Barichello will be able to (or allowed for that matter) to contend for the championship, and my personal opinion is that neither will Giancarlo Fisichella.
Kimi Raikkonen and Juan Pablo Montoya will bring out the very best in each other, and my biggest question mark about McLaren is the engine, and to see if Kimi is a car-breaker or not.
I will try to refrain from using certain words to much.JayVee wrote:K-D, you like the word clearly don't you!K-D wrote:I personally have no doubt that Kimi is clearly a better F1 driver than Juan Pablo.
Well you have clearly not stated that when you put up your preview of the season. At that time you said this:
You clearly state Barrichello and Fisichella won't contend for the championship but in fact have Montoya as a candidate. And in your blurb about McLaren you don't mention anything about one being clearly better than the other.K-D wrote:.... The contenders in 2005 will be:
Michael Schumacher
Kimi Raikkonen
Juan Pablo Montoya
Fernando Alonso
I will be VERY surprised if any other drivers make a real push for the championship, with the relative weakness that I suspect Ferrari will have in 2005, there is no way that Rubens Barichello will be able to (or allowed for that matter) to contend for the championship, and my personal opinion is that neither will Giancarlo Fisichella.
Kimi Raikkonen and Juan Pablo Montoya will bring out the very best in each other, and my biggest question mark about McLaren is the engine, and to see if Kimi is a car-breaker or not.
Something happened during this season that made you say clearly but with only two races as team-mates, that is way too premature
K-D, you won't get away that easily,K-D wrote: I will try to refrain from using certain words to much.
There is obviously a distinction between my call for how the 2005 season would pan out, posted before the seaosn start, and then how I see reality now.
In addition there is a clear difference between the performance of a given driven in one out of many seasons, and then of a given driver in a specific season.
Lastly I learn every day, since the posting of my season predictions I have learned how certain driving traits will be at a disadvantage compared to others, and that the "seat of the pants" drivers will underperform on occasion, this the reason that Villeneuve and Montoya are and will be having a difficult time in 2005.
There is no doubt in my mind that Kimi is a better F1 driver than Juan Pablo.
Sorry to correct you JayVee, but we are discussing more than one thing here.JayVee wrote:K-D, you won't get away that easily,K-D wrote: I will try to refrain from using certain words to much.
There is obviously a distinction between my call for how the 2005 season would pan out, posted before the seaosn start, and then how I see reality now.
In addition there is a clear difference between the performance of a given driven in one out of many seasons, and then of a given driver in a specific season.
Lastly I learn every day, since the posting of my season predictions I have learned how certain driving traits will be at a disadvantage compared to others, and that the "seat of the pants" drivers will underperform on occasion, this the reason that Villeneuve and Montoya are and will be having a difficult time in 2005.
There is no doubt in my mind that Kimi is a better F1 driver than Juan Pablo.
Now you are talking about this season specifically. If that is the case 2 races aren't enough to make a 'no doubt in my mind' judgement. Add to that Raikkonen was at McLaren for much much longer than Montoya
And that is what I have been saying.
Gee you're a stubborn Betelgeuzean
Correct what ? Did I say anything wrongK-D wrote:Sorry to correct you JayVee, but we are discussing more than one thing here.
1) is Kimi a better F1 driver than Juan Pablo this season?? - K-D says yes.
2) Is Kimi a better F1 driver than Juan Pablo under the currect rules and regulations?? - K-D says yes.
Agreed it will be close,though Raikkonen looks to be better,but i'll hold my judgement for now....JayVee wrote: They will be close though. Clearlymuch closer than Michael / Rubens and Fernando / Giancarlo
Absolutely. On some raceweekends he will dominate Kimi and run away with the race, I just do not see him doing that over a season.Kapel wrote:...
K-D would also agree than there cant be a much of a difference between the 2,once Montoya is settle at Mclaren.