News On F1 Forums - Talk Formula 1

julian mayo wrote: Okay, we all know that Ozbears are a tad slow, I did not see the race, I assume he ran into someone after he crossed the line

Didn't see the race

The wet race that Fisichella was crowned the winner in Malaysia, the one where the Bambino (no-one-can-beat-me-in-the-wet) spun out, the one that Webber lost it and crashed and Alonso drove straight into one of Webber's loose tyres and the race was stopped. Result was based on the order a lap or 2 earlier.

Remember now

julian mayo wrote: My defiition of a bad crash is, a burn or a break that costs at least 4 races. how many did he miss?

I hope no one goes through that.

And it is very wrong IMO to assume a great has to go through that to be considered one

Senna was great before his fatal crash (and I don't think he had a bad one before that)

AAAhhh, you talk of the race where the FIA in its wisdom, set down a set of rules where a great driver can thru sheer idiocy arrive at the scene of an accident, ignoring all the marshals flags, at a velocity far ( ie 120kph too fast) greater than other drivers, great or otherwise,would not, and who did deem it to be sheer lunacy, crash, into a crashed car, seriously endangering the safety marshals, and then walk away to the ambulance, and have the race win awarded under the aforesaid FIA ( need I say more) regulations.
Is that the race to which you refer..
The race where I saw reckless endangerment, callous indifference, and a vast overestimatation by a driver of his own ability.?

julian mayo wrote:AAAhhh, you talk of the race where the FIA in its wisdom, set down a set of rules where a great driver can thru sheer idiocy arrive at the scene of an accident, ignoring all the marshals flags, at a velocity far ( ie 120kph too fast) greater than other drivers, great or otherwise,would not, and who did deem it to be sheer lunacy, crash, into a crashed car, seriously endangering the safety marshals, and then walk away to the ambulance, and have the race win awarded under the aforesaid FIA ( need I say more) regulations.
Is that the race to which you refer..
The race where I saw reckless endangerment, callous indifference, and a vast overestimatation by a driver of his own ability.?

Oh so you now watched that race!! And remember James Allen's version of the story. Interesting!

It's hard to see Webber crash in the wet

JayVee wrote:

julian mayo wrote:AAAhhh, you talk of the race where the FIA in its wisdom, set down a set of rules where a great driver can thru sheer idiocy arrive at the scene of an accident, ignoring all the marshals flags, at a velocity far ( ie 120kph too fast) greater than other drivers, great or otherwise,would not, and who did deem it to be sheer lunacy, crash, into a crashed car, seriously endangering the safety marshals, and then walk away to the ambulance, and have the race win awarded under the aforesaid FIA ( need I say more) regulations.
Is that the race to which you refer..
The race where I saw reckless endangerment, callous indifference, and a vast overestimatation by a driver of his own ability.?

Oh so you now watched that race!! And remember James Allen's version of the story. Interesting!

It's hard to see Webber crash in the wet

Just answer the question,

julian mayo wrote:

JayVee wrote:
Oh so you now watched that race!! And (you) remember James Allen's version of the story. Interesting!

It's hard to see Webber crash in the wet

Just answer the question,

I did! See above

JayVee wrote:

julian mayo wrote:

JayVee wrote:
Oh so you now watched that race!! And (you) remember James Allen's version of the story. Interesting!

It's hard to see Webber crash in the wet

Just answer the question,

I did! See above

Pardon my iggerance, who the hell is James Allen....wait...is he the boofhead commentator we get on the ch10 relay?

julian mayo wrote: Pardon my iggerance, who the hell is James Allen....wait...is he the boofhead commentator we get on the ch10 relay?

Yup!

You are getting good at remembering things now

JayVee wrote:

julian mayo wrote: Pardon my iggerance, who the hell is James Allen....wait...is he the boofhead commentator we get on the ch10 relay?

Yup!

You are getting good at remembering things now

What were we discussing?

How Webber crashed in Brazil 2003 in the wet

Isn't this the Danica Patrick thread ? then why are we discussing Webber julian, do you have to mention Webber in every thread

JayVee wrote:How Webber crashed in Brazil 2003 in the wet

Isn't this the Danica Patrick thread ? then why are we discussing Webber julian, do you have to mention Webber in every thread

I feel that it is appropriate to discuss two brilliant drivers in the same thread, it saves on coal.

Hopefully Danica will replace Webber in F1. i am sure she wont do a detour at every Fosters sign.

GhoGho wrote:Hopefully Danica will replace Webber in F1. i am sure she wont do a detour at every Fosters sign.

No Australian drinks fosters! Fosters is a joke we play on other countries!

julian mayo wrote:No Australian drinks fosters! Fosters is a joke we play on other countries!

Maybe MW is laughing so hard when he sees the joke he cant help but go off the pace

GhoGho wrote:

julian mayo wrote:No Australian drinks fosters! Fosters is a joke we play on other countries!

Maybe MW is laughing so hard when he sees the joke he cant help but go off the pace

A Craftsman is only as good as the tools he has to work with.

In which case, GhoGho's right(referring to his Friday 8 July posting)--Danica is a better driver than Webber.