Haven't checked yet but assume that I have leapt from the top of the idiots table, waving to everyone on my way to the bottom.jido wrote:So how did you do?![]()
![]()
![]()
.....
..........
.........

Moderator: 8 n Pole Admin
Haven't checked yet but assume that I have leapt from the top of the idiots table, waving to everyone on my way to the bottom.jido wrote:So how did you do?![]()
![]()
![]()
33 is quite good compared to my 19jacfan wrote:Just checked my results and as predicted I am on the way down this week. I got 33 which is ok but compared to Bundy's 38 I will probably be mid field or lower.
I am trying to get the surprise results right. However whenever I think there'll be a surprise race everything turns out normal. On the other hand... Oh well, forget itjacfan wrote:Up until Canada I was behind Jeremy in the tipping but am now in front of him. Beat him again this weekend.. he got 26. Would be nice to be the winner of the group I set up. Haven't managed that yet.
gkaytaz wrote:33 is quite good compared to my 19jacfan wrote:Just checked my results and as predicted I am on the way down this week. I got 33 which is ok but compared to Bundy's 38 I will probably be mid field or lower.Complain you should not I think, hm?
Well, 7 races...and he has been on the podium every time.jacfan wrote:gkaytaz wrote:33 is quite good compared to my 19jacfan wrote:Just checked my results and as predicted I am on the way down this week. I got 33 which is ok but compared to Bundy's 38 I will probably be mid field or lower.Complain you should not I think, hm?
![]()
Yes 33 is good but compared to Bundy? I think we are all going to have to start putting LH higher.
I had him in my tips but 3rd. Will be thinking p1 or p2 in future.Julian Mayo wrote:Well, 7 races...and he has been on the podium every time.jacfan wrote:gkaytaz wrote:
33 is quite good compared to my 19Complain you should not I think, hm?
![]()
Yes 33 is good but compared to Bundy? I think we are all going to have to start putting LH higher.
says a lot for doing 5000 hours in the simulator
I should have. Still being a rookie I thought he'd have made a mistake some time during the first 7 races.jacfan wrote:gkaytaz wrote:33 is quite good compared to my 19jacfan wrote:Just checked my results and as predicted I am on the way down this week. I got 33 which is ok but compared to Bundy's 38 I will probably be mid field or lower.Complain you should not I think, hm?
![]()
Yes 33 is good but compared to Bundy? I think we are all going to have to start putting LH higher.
Yep, he's good. No doubt about that.Julian Mayo wrote: Well, 7 races...and he has been on the podium every time.
says a lot for doing 5000 hours in the simulator
Yes me too.gkaytaz wrote:I should have. Still being a rookie I thought he'd have made a mistake some time during the first 7 races.jacfan wrote:gkaytaz wrote:
33 is quite good compared to my 19Complain you should not I think, hm?
![]()
Yes 33 is good but compared to Bundy? I think we are all going to have to start putting LH higher.
At least you did have him. For some reason I didn't even pick him in the top eight. Thought he'd make a mistake or have a mechanical failure.jacfan wrote:I had him in my tips but 3rd. Will be thinking p1 or p2 in future.
Wouldn't do much for me .... 5000 hours on the stimulator... amazing.Julian Mayo wrote:Well, 7 races...and he has been on the podium every time.jacfan wrote:gkaytaz wrote:
33 is quite good compared to my 19Complain you should not I think, hm?
![]()
Yes 33 is good but compared to Bundy? I think we are all going to have to start putting LH higher.
says a lot for doing 5000 hours in the simulator
I had Nick. Jeremy had Ralf so I feel like I deserve to be above him points wise.gkaytaz wrote:At least you did have him. For some reason I didn't even pick him in the top eight. Thought he'd make a mistake or have a mechanical failure.jacfan wrote:I had him in my tips but 3rd. Will be thinking p1 or p2 in future.
LH and Nick both let me down