Welcome to NewsOnF1 Forums where you can chat about anything Formula 1
https://www.newsonf1.net/forum/
He's drifting............drifting..................oh no................. he's lost it!Snowy wrote:Reality check<T-K> wrote:You're drifting off again snowy.....Snowy wrote:
Alternate races won by Jenson and LewisHakinnen in frame for Mclaren seat
Yep. Poor Snowy. And I was so hopeful that he'd recover.GhoGho wrote:He's drifting............drifting..................oh no................. he's lost it!Snowy wrote:Reality check
GhoGho wrote:He's drifting............drifting..................oh no................. he's lost it!Snowy wrote:Reality check<T-K> wrote:
You're drifting off again snowy.....
I understood dominant that they will be winning races and even finishing 1-2.Amjad wrote:you are very right, but they will strugle for sure and i will bet on that,JayVee wrote: There will be an advantage for Ferrari, Toyota and Williams, how much no one knows but I very much doubt it will be huge.
Toyota can't be used as a yardstick. They had major problems with their tyres early in the season but that doesn't mean Renault or McLaren will. There is a huge difference between those two teams and Toyota!
when i said Ferrari and Toyota will dominant that do not mean that other teams will not perform well, they have to perform well but they can't show their full strengh and it will take time to show it, at that time other team will take advantage.
You are so right. I forgot all about Willis.Snowy wrote:
Unfortunately for me and for Honda you have both missed the upheavals in the Honda Technical dept.They have lost Tchnical Director Geoff Willis, Senior Aerodynamicists Willem Toet and Simon Lacey. All these changes are Surmountable for a team with a strong leader and track record of good decision making, however Honda is not that bright and BAR weren't that bright either strategy wise. Much as I would like to see them triumph the only plus's they have is driver line up, experience on Bridgestone in 2003/4 and that isn't going to make that much difference, when you consider that if the car is a pig not even a Schuey can make it a winner.
No rumours here 
some claim the benneton wasJayVee wrote:You are so right. I forgot all about Willis.Snowy wrote:
Unfortunately for me and for Honda you have both missed the upheavals in the Honda Technical dept.
Honda will be going backward next year then!
But when did Schumacher win in a pig of a car ?
I agree, I do recall a Schuey supporter claiming the Benneton was a pig on this forumJayVee wrote:The Benetton was NOT a pig of a car.
It may have been slightly slower than the Williams but it wasn't a pig of a car.
Actually from 1988 till 1997 only twice did Benetton finish below third in the championship (and both times they finished fourth).
That cannot be a pig and achieve that.
A pig of a car shouldn't finish better than 8th in my books
The one who called Schuey a GodJulian Mayo wrote:I agree, I do recall a Schuey supporter claiming the Benneton was a pig on this forumJayVee wrote:The Benetton was NOT a pig of a car.
It may have been slightly slower than the Williams but it wasn't a pig of a car.
Actually from 1988 till 1997 only twice did Benetton finish below third in the championship (and both times they finished fourth).
That cannot be a pig and achieve that.
A pig of a car shouldn't finish better than 8th in my books
I would never call the Benetton a pig of a car. Now as for Mr MS... well that is a different topic. spam?jacfan wrote:
Not likely. They'd have to change the box design and make it all red then.Julian Mayo wrote:spam?jacfan wrote:
That is what I said wasn't it? Even Schuey can't make a pig of a car a winner. I didn't say he has made a pig of a car a winner, however he has won numerous races in cars that should not have won because as everybody is no doubt aware he had a not inconsiderable talent and ability behind the wheel.JayVee wrote:You are so right. I forgot all about Willis.Snowy wrote:
Unfortunately for me and for Honda you have both missed the upheavals in the Honda Technical dept.
Honda will be going backward next year then!
But when did Schumacher win in a pig of a car ?
Yes I know but your statement glorified Schuey and hence my question.Snowy wrote:That is what I said wasn't it? Even Schuey can't make a pig of a car a winner. I didn't say he has made a pig of a car a winner, however he has won numerous races in cars that should not have won because as everybody is no doubt aware he had a not inconsiderable talent and ability behind the wheel.JayVee wrote:You are so right. I forgot all about Willis.Snowy wrote:
Unfortunately for me and for Honda you have both missed the upheavals in the Honda Technical dept.
Honda will be going backward next year then!
But when did Schumacher win in a pig of a car ?
The Beneton was an outstanding car far superior to the Williams in '94 and at least on a par with it in '95.
(I struggled a bit to understand the first one )Double negatives; not impossible to love emJayVee wrote:Yes I know but your statement glorified Schuey and hence my question.Snowy wrote:That is what I said wasn't it? Even Schuey can't make a pig of a car a winner. I didn't say he has made a pig of a car a winner, however he has won numerous races in cars that should not have won because as everybody is no doubt aware he had a not inconsiderable talent and ability behind the wheel.JayVee wrote:
You are so right. I forgot all about Willis.
Honda will be going backward next year then!
But when did Schumacher win in a pig of a car ?
The Beneton was an outstanding car far superior to the Williams in '94 and at least on a par with it in '95.
But why "a not inconsiderable" ? Wouldn't it be easier to say "a considerable" ?
