Page 4 of 5

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 5:52 pm
by Julian Mayo
Byron Forbes wrote:Firstly, the thing that I found most prominent here was the need to overhaul the safety car procedures. Montoya had that race under control only to have it all undermined by that idiotic process. I think they should race back to the line, fall into line behind the pace car, and then pit if they wish. There should be no racing in the pits ie the order they cross the S/F line when the yellow starts should be the order they stay in. The only way to make up positions is by not pitting. Montoya was robbed.

Webber's stock dropped even more. A good driver in that car/circumstance gets 3rd - unfortunately Webber doesn't qualify as a "good" driver atm. He's just not measuring up and handling the pressure at all so far. If it's not bad luck then it's bad driving. I don't think Webber has had a race that anyone, including himself, would be satisfied with this year. The clock's ticking Webber! He needs to do something impressive soon or Frank will be looking for more than new engine suppliers.

Crrrrrraaaap! IMHO :lol:

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 5:56 pm
by rah
Byron Forbes wrote:Firstly, the thing that I found most prominent here was the need to overhaul the safety car procedures. Montoya had that race under control only to have it all undermined by that idiotic process. I think they should race back to the line, fall into line behind the pace car, and then pit if they wish. There should be no racing in the pits ie the order they cross the S/F line when the yellow starts should be the order they stay in. The only way to make up positions is by not pitting. Montoya was robbed.

Webber's stock dropped even more. A good driver in that car/circumstance gets 3rd - unfortunately Webber doesn't qualify as a "good" driver atm. He's just not measuring up and handling the pressure at all so far. If it's not bad luck then it's bad driving. I don't think Webber has had a race that anyone, including himself, would be satisfied with this year. The clock's ticking Webber! He needs to do something impressive soon or Frank will be looking for more than new engine suppliers.
Mate, your just not up with this whole aussie thing are you. Just a reminder: you cheer them on, like the underdogs they are, all the way to the top! Then you slag them off for being there. How can you have a tall poppy if you wont even let it grow?

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 6:12 pm
by Julian Mayo
rah wrote:
Byron Forbes wrote:Firstly, the thing that I found most prominent here was the need to overhaul the safety car procedures. Montoya had that race under control only to have it all undermined by that idiotic process. I think they should race back to the line, fall into line behind the pace car, and then pit if they wish. There should be no racing in the pits ie the order they cross the S/F line when the yellow starts should be the order they stay in. The only way to make up positions is by not pitting. Montoya was robbed.

Webber's stock dropped even more. A good driver in that car/circumstance gets 3rd - unfortunately Webber doesn't qualify as a "good" driver atm. He's just not measuring up and handling the pressure at all so far. If it's not bad luck then it's bad driving. I don't think Webber has had a race that anyone, including himself, would be satisfied with this year. The clock's ticking Webber! He needs to do something impressive soon or Frank will be looking for more than new engine suppliers.
Mate, your just not up with this whole aussie thing are you. Just a reminder: you cheer them on, like the underdogs they are, all the way to the top! Then you slag them off for being there. How can you have a tall poppy if you wont even let it grow?

needs to get his head out of fred and down to eastern creek for a drive day! how is "lightening" spelt...drinking to forget certainly seems to be starting to have an effect :lol:

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 6:32 pm
by Kapel
Still here????? :shock: :roll:

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 7:16 pm
by Julian Mayo
Kapel wrote:Still here????? :shock: :roll:
in the bush next door, sights pointed on the cable running fom the house to fred, dogs on guard, have rung SAS mates 8)

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 7:33 pm
by Kapel
julian mayo wrote:
Kapel wrote:Still here????? :shock: :roll:
in the bush next door, sights pointed on the cable running fom the house to fred, dogs on guard, have rung SAS mates 8)
Is there where u hide ur smokes?? :wink:

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 7:53 pm
by Julian Mayo
Kapel wrote:
julian mayo wrote:
Kapel wrote:Still here????? :shock: :roll:
in the bush next door, sights pointed on the cable running fom the house to fred, dogs on guard, have rung SAS mates 8)
Is there where u hide ur smokes?? :wink:


The bush next door runs into national park, 38 days of forced march( with due consideration to the dogs, the kids are super fit) and we are out of New South Wales, without stepping on to a road :lol:

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 7:58 pm
by Kapel
Wouldnt swimming or surfing be a better option :wink: ...ok ok...need to take a pill now :lol:

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 8:26 pm
by Julian Mayo
Kapel wrote:Wouldnt swimming or surfing be a better option :wink: ...ok ok...need to take a pill now :lol:



Um Kappy, Oz Is an Island!
I would take the green one :lol:

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 8:39 pm
by Kapel
In how many colours is it available?? :wink:

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 11:03 pm
by Julian Mayo
Kapel wrote:In how many colours is it available?? :wink:
OZ?

Green,
Gold
And any colour you want, .... [EDITED POLITICAL]

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 3:28 pm
by Kapel
julian mayo wrote:
Kapel wrote:In how many colours is it available?? :wink:
OZ?

Green,
Gold
And any colour you want, .... [EDITED POLITICAL]
What was colours gotta do with Politics??? :shock: :shock:

Red & Yellow would be prefered :wink:

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:06 pm
by Ed
Kapel wrote: What was colours gotta do with Politics??? :shock: :shock:
Nothing but what came after the colours did :!:

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:17 pm
by Kapel
Ah!!!

Would understand a thing about Australian politics or whatever anyways.. :wink:

U've been having a tough time editing these post havent u?? :shock: :shock:

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:23 pm
by Ed
Kapel wrote: U've been having a tough time editing these post havent u?? :shock: :shock:
Sort of!

But I guess it reminds people that we are serious about not allowing politics/religion to creep into these forums.