THE RUMOUR FACTORY FOR 2007

Julian Mayo · Post by **Julian Mayo** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 7:45 pm

gkaytaz wrote:
Julian Mayo wrote:
Southernman wrote:As a matter of interest, if they were to have night races, just where on the cars would they put the headlights.
Miners lamps on the drivers helmets...
Perhaps some drift races?

Is there a driver called Rourke?

gkaytaz · Post by **gkaytaz** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:26 pm

Julian Mayo wrote:
gkaytaz wrote:
Julian Mayo wrote:
Miners lamps on the drivers helmets...
Perhaps some drift races?
Is there a driver called Rourke?

Mickey

Julian Mayo · Post by **Julian Mayo** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 10:50 pm

gkaytaz wrote:
Julian Mayo wrote:
gkaytaz wrote:
Perhaps some drift races?
Is there a driver called Rourke?
Mickey

Mickey's Drift doesn't have quite the same ring to it.

gkaytaz · Post by **gkaytaz** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 4:11 am

Julian Mayo wrote:
gkaytaz wrote:
Julian Mayo wrote: Is there a driver called Rourke?
Mickey
Mickey's Drift doesn't have quite the same ring to it.

How about Alamo then?

You get my drift?

jacfan · Post by **jacfan** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:43 pm

gkaytaz wrote:
Julian Mayo wrote:
gkaytaz wrote:
Mickey
Mickey's Drift doesn't have quite the same ring to it.
How about Alamo then? You get my drift?

gkaytaz · Post by **gkaytaz** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:35 pm

jacfan wrote:
gkaytaz wrote:
Julian Mayo wrote:
Mickey's Drift doesn't have quite the same ring to it.
How about Alamo then? You get my drift?

All about drift. Perhaps we should have started another thread called "anything drift"

jacfan · Post by **jacfan** » Tue Mar 06, 2007 12:06 am

Driftwood????

gkaytaz · Post by **gkaytaz** » Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:28 am

jacfan wrote:Driftwood????

If you insist...

jacfan · Post by **jacfan** » Tue Mar 06, 2007 12:37 pm

gkaytaz wrote:
jacfan wrote:Driftwood????
If you insist...

No I don't insist

I am just very agreeable and need to have the agreement ratified.

Yes I think that is correct.... do you agree?

gkaytaz · Post by **gkaytaz** » Tue Mar 06, 2007 4:28 pm

jacfan wrote:
gkaytaz wrote:
jacfan wrote:Driftwood????
If you insist...
No I don't insist I am just very agreeable and need to have the agreement ratified. Yes I think that is correct.... do you agree?

Yep. And we need to ask JM about Fred.

Julian Mayo · Post by **Julian Mayo** » Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:48 pm

gkaytaz wrote:
jacfan wrote:
gkaytaz wrote:
If you insist...
No I don't insist I am just very agreeable and need to have the agreement ratified. Yes I think that is correct.... do you agree?
Yep. And we need to ask JM about Fred.

Fred's goooorne, he was too agreeable

mlittle · Post by **mlittle** » Wed Mar 07, 2007 10:20 am

Going back on topic, according to the geniuses over at autoracing1.com, rumor has it that the FIA is going to require Bridgestone to supply two different tire compounds for teams to use during the course of a grand prix race...or as the revised 2007 Sporting Regulations put it:

Each tire supplier must undertake to provide no more than two specifications of dry-weather tires at each Event, each of which must be of one homogenous compound and visibly distingushable from one another when a car is on the track.

Julian Mayo · Post by **Julian Mayo** » Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:40 pm

Bernie denies that a deal has been done for a Singapore Night GP. Now would be a good time to book airline tickets, then

Julian Mayo · Post by **Julian Mayo** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 6:17 am

If the Singapore night race is a success, Melbourne, and possibly China will be night races. Its all about tv ratings dearie

gkaytaz · Post by **gkaytaz** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:37 pm

Some clown came up with the idea of revising the Indianapolis circuit layout (for both F1 and MotoGP), reversing the direction, eliminating the double hairpin in the infield and adding two 180s on to the banked turn 13.

The details are at: http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/03/17/t ... #more-3436

Why not use the regular NASCAR oval while they are at it?