Page 6 of 13
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 5:46 pm
by Julian Mayo
In my case, rarely, I get hurt easily, especially when no-one replies to emails
Kappy did send me a pic once, when we were discussing the confluence of certain rivers ( do not ask why !), and the pic contained an image of his wife.
He has been carrying a loaded firearm since, and cocks it every time he hears an aussie accent within 25kms of his sweet lady.

Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 8:57 pm
by Kapel
Mayb i got wrong info on Massa for 25 days testing the new car..it would have been 25 days testing of new car before the first race...
Sorry my Apologies

Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 9:04 pm
by Kapel
Julian Mayo wrote:In my case, rarely, I get hurt easily, especially when no-one replies to emails
Kappy did send me a pic once, when we were discussing the confluence of certain rivers ( do not ask why !), and the pic contained an image of his wife.
He has been carrying a loaded firearm since, and cocks it every time he hears an aussie accent within 25kms of his sweet lady.

Yeah Julian u got it rgt... spot on.
I was travelling a bit,did visit Agra for a day..but was not day dreaming about Ferrari glorious days though...cos i believe those days arent over
Has K-D returned with K???
I presume it could be him,cos no1 here seems to supporting Ferrari,Midland,Aguri or STR

Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 9:23 pm
by Julian Mayo
Kapel wrote:Julian Mayo wrote:In my case, rarely, I get hurt easily, especially when no-one replies to emails
Kappy did send me a pic once, when we were discussing the confluence of certain rivers ( do not ask why !), and the pic contained an image of his wife.
He has been carrying a loaded firearm since, and cocks it every time he hears an aussie accent within 25kms of his sweet lady.

Yeah Julian u got it rgt... spot on.
I was travelling a bit,did visit Agra for a day..but was not day dreaming about Ferrari glorious days though...cos i believe those days arent over
Has K-D returned with K???
I presume it could be him,cos no1 here seems to supporting Ferrari,Midland,Aguri or STR

Sadly, if it is him, and we have rumbled him, I doubt we will hear more. He would have to be very, very, good to even tthink of tring to take on The Queen, ( bow, scrape, tug forelock, fawn, simper)

Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 9:50 pm
by Kapel
Oh thats sad.
What u guys keep doing to new entrants?Let them be,before the axe comes out
K its ok in here,i'll support you

(
till u dont stand on my foot)

Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:00 pm
by Julian Mayo
Kapel wrote:Oh thats sad.
What u guys keep doing to new entrants?Let them be,before the axe comes out
K its ok in here,i'll support you

(
till u dont stand on my foot)

Kappy, as you know I will support Ferrari as soon as they enter
2 drivers into the championship
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:11 pm
by Kapel
Julian Mayo wrote:Kapel wrote:Oh thats sad.
What u guys keep doing to new entrants?Let them be,before the axe comes out
K its ok in here,i'll support you

(
till u dont stand on my foot)

Kappy, as you know I will support Ferrari as soon as they enter
2 drivers into the championship

next year mayb
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:27 pm
by Redhead
Julian Mayo wrote:I will support Ferrari as soon as they enter 2 drivers into the championship
How many drivers does it take to win the world championship

Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:39 pm
by Julian Mayo
Redhead wrote:Julian Mayo wrote:I will support Ferrari as soon as they enter 2 drivers into the championship
How many drivers does it take to win the world championship

usually 2 rivalling each other, til one establishes a points break over the other, then the one lower in the points acts as rear gunner. If Barrichello had been given free reign the Manchamp last year could have looked a lot different
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:46 pm
by <T-K>
Redhead wrote:
How many drivers does it take to win the world championship

...............22..................
1 to win it and 21 to say I can do that next year

Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 11:08 pm
by Redhead
Julian Mayo wrote:usually 2 rivalling each other, til one establishes a points break over the other, then the one lower in the points acts as rear gunner.
There is an alternative, and it worked for Ferrari for five years in a row
Julian Mayo wrote:If Barrichello had been given free reign the Manchamp last year could have looked a lot different
Would the Ferrari/Bridgestone have suddenly become competitive

I doubt it.
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 11:20 pm
by Julian Mayo
Redhead wrote:Julian Mayo wrote:usually 2 rivalling each other, til one establishes a points break over the other, then the one lower in the points acts as rear gunner.
There is an alternative, and it worked for Ferrari for five years in a row
Julian Mayo wrote:If Barrichello had been given free reign the Manchamp last year could have looked a lot different
Would the Ferrari/Bridgestone have suddenly become competitive

I doubt it.
on two occasions to my albeit somewhat "fonged" memory at this hour of the night, if Barra had been given equal machinery instead of Ferrari desperately throwing any "quickfix" they could think of at Schueys car and giving the suss bits to Barra, they would have scored a lot more points in the Manchamp. The Bridgestones (imho) were far less of a problem than the F2005

Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 11:43 pm
by Redhead
Julian Mayo wrote:The Bridgestones (imho) were far less of a problem than the F2005
We'll have to agree to disagree on that one. Having Bridgestone to themselves was a key element in Ferrari's failure in 2005

.
It was also a key element in Ferrari's success in 2000-04,

so I guess I can't complain.
Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 2:23 am
by Julian Mayo
Redhead wrote:Julian Mayo wrote:The Bridgestones (imho) were far less of a problem than the F2005
We'll have to agree to disagree on that one. Having Bridgestone to themselves was a key element in Ferrari's failure in 2005

.
It was also a key element in Ferrari's success in 2000-04,

so I guess I can't complain.
I can but quote JV, "why are they using the 2004 chassis?" to test for 2006 ?
Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 3:32 pm
by Kapel
May i interrupt to answer that..thanks..
F2005 was crap,but was realised on at the end of the season.The chassis was bad for a single tyre rule apart from some aero inefficiency.It just ate up the tyres.But also Bridgestone got it wrong in their calculation or whatever.I would say it was 50:50
Now for testing on F2004..its only cos the tyre change rule is back & Ferrari is taking a big risk by going a year back & using it as a base for 2006.Lets c how it turns up.
IMHO
