Page 2 of 5
Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 8:09 pm
by JayVee
Julian I am not the type that switches allegiance when a driver starts winning. If I am that type I would be supporting the Bambino driver.
I am still a crazy fan of JV but in a Sauber (a team which has never won a race), I have to be realistic. JV is nearing the end of his career and I find in Alonso The Cute all the ideals I like to see in a driver so why not support him too ?
I've always rated Alonso highly but I didn't expect Renault to give him a car that was close to the McLaren and in my predictions for 2005 back in January I said
JayVee wrote:Well I'd love to see JV win it again but being realistic I think Raikkonen will win it.
Michael will lose his spark this year
Button has caused too much damage at BAR
Montoya won't be a match for Raikkonen
Alonso may finish second
Fisichella may be good but won't match Alonso
Webber is good but I doubt Williams will deliver
And these were my picks for the Australian race back in March before Alonso started winning regularly.
JayVee wrote:Ok I just put in my picks (I know I can change them later though!!)
Winner: Fernando Alonso
Second: Kimi Raikkonen
Third: Giancarlo Fisichella
Fourth: Rubens Barrichello
Fifth: Mark Webber
Sixth: Nick Heidfeild
Seventh: Jacques Villeneuve
Eighth: David Coulthard
Pole: Fernando Alonso
It'll be close between Alonso and Kimi. Montoya is too hard on the car and retires. Fisichella is no match for Alonso but the Renault is so much faster than the rest. Michael goes off into the gravel frustrated at how slow the 04M is. Barrichello makes it to the finish happy to see Michael off!
Webber and Heidfeld make it but the Williams is too slow. Villeneuve makes it ahead of Coutlhard.
Both BAR grenades blow, Trulli and Ralfie are in the points at the start of the race but lose consistency !!
The 2 Jordan drivers take each other out
So don't just assume things about me and make them sound like facts
Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 8:16 pm
by Julian Mayo
Most humble self effacing abashed embarassed humiliated grovelling apologies My Gracious Queen
(niggling thought in back of mind about preseason chat lingers)
Ahh, I must content myself with the thought that Hate is but the closest emotion to love.
Your even more Humble Servant
Sadbear.
Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 8:41 pm
by Kapel
Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:04 pm
by cmlean
Dear Julian
I feel our Queen has severely rapped you over the knuckles and set you back in your place.
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 1:31 am
by Julian Mayo
cmlean wrote:Dear Julian
I feel our Queen has severely rapped you over the knuckles and set you back in your place.
Dear CMLEAN,
thank you for taking the time out of your incredibly busy life to point out to me that which others would consider to be somewhat obvious,
Yours
"Chastened"
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 7:54 am
by evo
hi, does anybody know how much slower the V8's are compared to the V10's? all i know is that a f2004 equipped with a v8 can go around the vallelunga ciruit with massa at the wheel at a time of 1:13.007. however, schumacher could probaly go about a second a lap faster.
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 9:33 am
by Julian Mayo
evo wrote:hi, does anybody know how much slower the V8's are compared to the V10's? all i know is that a f2004 equipped with a v8 can go around the vallelunga ciruit with massa at the wheel at a time of 1:13.007. however, schumacher could probaly go about a second a lap faster.
I read a figure somewhere that suggests around 10 secs a lap.
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 4:14 pm
by Ed
evo wrote:hi, does anybody know how much slower the V8's are compared to the V10's? all i know is that a f2004 equipped with a v8 can go around the vallelunga ciruit with massa at the wheel at a time of 1:13.007. however, schumacher could probaly go about a second a lap faster.
Comparing actual testing times from a couple of test sessions:
At Monza in September
Best time set by Panis was a 1:27.983 in a development chassis running the V8 engine.
Best time set by Trulli was a 1:21.350 in this year's car
At Silverstone in September
Best time set by de la Rosa was a 1:22.974 running the V8 engine
Best time set by Wurz was a 1:17.673 in this year's car
At Jerez in late September
Best time set by Ricardo Zonta was a 1:20.111 running the V8 engine
Best time set by Jarno Trulli was a 1:18.836.
Depending on the track of course, expect the time difference to range between 2 to 6 seconds with the gap getting smaller as the season progresses.
You can check out more info on the
V8 Testing Thread
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 1:39 pm
by cmlean
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 1:57 pm
by Julian Mayo
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 3:10 pm
by cmlean
'Tis only an apology to you for stating the obvious.
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 3:13 pm
by Julian Mayo
cmlean wrote:'Tis only an apology to you for stating the obvious.
awww, no need, Shucks
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2005 8:54 pm
by Kapel
Ed,
Engine changes next year from V10 to V8.But do v know,if the V8 engines need to last for 2 races/1 race or can be changed like old times??
There would uncertainity in teams to get V8 to last 1400kms right from word go
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2005 10:12 pm
by Ed
Kapel wrote:Ed,
Engine changes next year from V10 to V8.But do v know,if the V8 engines need to last for 2 races/1 race or can be changed like old times??
There would uncertainity in teams to get V8 to last 1400kms right from word go
The "2 races per engine" rule remains for 2006 and many "exotic materials" are banned.
Only the tyre rules have changed
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2005 3:34 pm
by Kapel
Thanks Ed.
What are these exotic materials
