Some excellent points made re: wet driving. And I am as fond of little Felipe as I am of Fernando the cute; but the points some chaps were making about how superior he, Felipe, was in the dry seem, to me, to be more about the Ferarri than about Felipe. Even Fernando in the post race said he didn't have the pace in the dry. In other words, he couldn't get close enough to contest the race.
So. When the wet comes and he drives away with the race, how can it be Felipe's tyres' fault. I'm not saying, pace Julian I believe it was who told the story of his experience with identical wets and un-identical performances on the road, that Felipe's tyres couldn't have been bad somehow, but this is F1, the pinnacle of motorsport. Can't we expect the best from the materials supplied, ESPECIALLY when said materials are IDENTICAL to the teams? So. Yes. I suppose in theory it could have been his tyres that betrayed him, but on the circuit it sure looked like something else.
Now. I guess nobody knows about Lewis's inability to stand up after his shunt in qualifying? Was that because he had the flu? If so, I am one amazed puppy at his brilliance in the car!
Just one more passing observation. Remember when they changed the point values to keep Michael from winning the WDC by the seventh race? Now you can see what's wrong with their fiddling: Fernando and Kimi have 3 wins each. Felipe and Lewis have two. But Lewis is leading the WDC and Kimi is in fourth place.
We just saw in Germany what winning means to drivers. I would say it means the same thing to fans. Pity the rules makers think a second place is 80% of a Win! A more reasonable percentage would be 50%!
Jim Watt
P.S. Keep your hopes up Jay Vee

My Racing Gods: Fangio, Vukovich; Senna & Mears --all racers all the time; graceful winners & generous in defeat, but never giving up!!