I guess I'm sort of puzzled at the vitriol flying here. I am perfectly willing to consider it probable that a racer will do what he thinks he has to do to win, no matter what sort of "orders" are being issued. Remember when Kimi refused to pit for tyres in Germany because he was racing to win?
Everyone admired him for being a racer, indeed for putting his LIFE at risk in his effort to win. Because that's what RACING is! And I hardly think the fact that he crashed out and so lost McLaren points in that race led to Ron Dennis sacking him! Indeed most of us would have been really chuffing if Ron Dennis dared to suggest that his Racing Team's precious Manufacturers points were more important than his drivers trying to WIN!
And it wasn't for trying to win that his many detractors blamed Michael. He was detested by many because he arranged for his team to support him off the circuit as well as on. In fact, Michael's example of managing his team is pretty much understood to be the reason for F1's recent harping on the "No Team Orders" theme. And for a very good reason: F1 needs to disabuse the public of the notion that it's all decided by money. In fact, it must BE money and money only that keeps Monaco and Hungary on the calendar. I didn't think this year's races on these twisty hard to overtake circuits were so bad. But they certainly CAN be boring, especially if the bosses decide (via "team orders") the winner on Saturday in qualifications.
Now funnily enough, McLaren has been blamed by so called realist critics in the past for being so adamant about letting their drivers compete. For, in other words, NOT issuing team orders (beyond refusing to tolerate their drivers taking each other out in a race).
So it sounds ironic to me to hear so many complaining here about Lewis ignoring "team orders." Well suppose he did? How does that justify what Fernando did? And for doing it so blatantly? Everyone with a pair of eyes could see? And how could the stewards NOT react? Never mind whether they were prompted by Lewis! (Certainly they were prompted by Ron Dennis at Rascasse!! Formally. Publically. And much to everyone's satisfaction (except for Michael).
In the real world, Lewis's little sins (if in fact he committed them. this is the kind of inside chatter that I tend to dismiss because it can't be verified.) his sins, which I'm perfectly willing to allow you, didn't cost him or McLaren a single point. All Fernando had to do was beat him for the pole. Or overtake him in the race (Which would have made for some genuine excitement, tho' I doubt he'd have been any more likely to do it than Kimi. Still it would have been F1 at its best to see Kimi hounding Fernando hounding Lewis!
Instead, Fernando pulled a Michael. And it cost a bundle!! Now Fernando is supposed to be a brilliantly strategic driver (like Michael). You all heard Webbo (or was it Davy C?) say so before the race.
Alas, it appears he is a little TOO like Michael! Because he schemed himself into a most embarrassing spot --and one that has Zero to do with racing or talent. Only with, dare I say it, "cheating"?
Now if, for instance, Ron Dennis didn't like being ignored by Lewis, all he had to do was order his car pushed into the garage. Maybe he didn't do so because Lewis was consistently faster over the week than his estimable team mate. Or maybe he didn't do it because he "favors" Lewis over the Spaniard. Whatever.
But when a racing driver sits in his car (like Michael did at Rasscasse and Fernando in the pits) to prevent a potentially faster driver from taking his pole, I think the stewards HAVE TO ACT. Because it is embarrassing for the whole sport. It's obvious and it's clearly "un-sporting." Duh. Like putting sugar in the tank or cutting tyres.
I don't know, again, what kind of steps a team manager has to take when his orders are ignored, but I do know that Fernando's actions took Ron Dennis's options right out of his hands and resulted in the loss of a perfect opportunity for McLaren to absolutely BURY Ferarri!
Fernando's (or his fans') claiming that he had no choice because little Lewis was not obeying team orders is Extremely weak. And the whole affair reminds me, in a sort of photo negative way, of What Michael said at Rasscasse-gate: something like, "those who hate me will continue to hate me no matter what I do."
Ironically, Fernando could say, on the basis of some of what I read in this thread, "and those who love me will continue to love me no matter what I do."
But, of course, in the case of Rasscasse, it wasn't about whether we loved or hated Michael; it was about our disappointment that a champion acted like a chump.
Oh well, even the great Senna wasn't perfect. I suppose there must be someone, somewhere with stories about Fangio. Now that I think about it, I must have acted as badly more than once in my own humble life.
But, in the end, chaps, it's racing that matters. And we're getting the best racing this year we have seen in a very long time. And I, for one, am perfectly happy to see it continue. It doesn't matter that Ferarri are out of contention for the title; it doesn't matter that Kimi can't possibly make up enough ground to really threaten for WDC. He'll be on the circuit in their bloody mirrors like a hungry lion after a gazelle and WDC or no, I wouldn't count him out yet. Not in the only thing that REALLY matters: how often you win.
WIN. Finish First. Leave the others eating your dust

Thank you All for caring about racing and making it fun for me to read my email!!
Somehow we'll get through this three weeks in the desert
Jim Watt
My Racing Gods: Fangio, Vukovich; Senna & Mears --all racers all the time; graceful winners & generous in defeat, but never giving up!!