Page 30 of 36
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 10:26 am
by Julian Mayo
Redhead wrote:Julian Mayo wrote: I just cannot admire a team who allow or condone a driver to use dirty tactics as frquently as Schumaker does. He is the dirtiest driver I can think of, or recall, in any classification.
You oughta get out a bit more JM

.
And how dare you mis-spell his name

it was easy.

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 10:30 am
by Julian Mayo
Snowy wrote:Julian Mayo wrote:Ed wrote:
Well done to Jenson.
I think most would love to see a closely fought season who ever the drivers are.
With Jenson though, I think it is just that Aussie - Pommie rivalry

Nah, its that "dont like a big mouthed, egotistical,show pony, vain, arrogant, unreliable" sort of a thing

Julian I'm surprised at you

You always struck me as an objective kind of a guy.
You really must tell me what is fuelling your pain

Let me share your pain

I am objective.........I object having to put up with Button's big mouth. He would be the biggest underachiever in F1

Which pains me

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 10:57 am
by JayVee
Kapel wrote:
Obviously JayVee,I'm biased for Rubens anyday against
any driver in the world.

(
Sometimes that includes Michael too) N hey,Rubinho is a far far better driver than the little rebel.
U love that word dont u?

Are you implying that Michael is only sometimes a driver
That may explain everything then
Kapel wrote:
I've been a Ferrari fan as long as i can remember & yes Michael's too.N i 've always commented on what was unfair doing by Ferrari or Michael during the course of this forum.(like Austrai)
N i will continue to defend them when i feel they people bashing is unjustfied,and when its potrayed that they are the only one who conduct such deeds and other teams dont get criticise(BAR's illegal fuel tank,Mclaren Meb'98) to an extent ppl come would down heavily on Ferrari(Testing for eg).
BAR's illegal fuel

They were penalised heavily for that
Melb 98, that's 8 years ago. Even the tax office doesn't audit you for something that old
And they NEVER repeated it, in fact they PROVED a year later they don't have team orders unlike those repeat offenders
Kapel wrote:
Ferrai is one team everyone just love to HATE.
And Renault and Button and Villeneuve.
How many times did I tell you to take off those red glasses

Stop it, how many times did I tell you that is too NOISY

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 11:02 am
by Julian Mayo
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 11:02 am
by JayVee
Julian Mayo wrote:
I am objective.........I object having to put up with Button's big mouth. He would be the biggest underachiever in F1

Which pains me

And you are Webber's spokesman aren't you
To be fair to Button, I think Irvine had a bigger mouth

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 11:03 am
by Julian Mayo
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:24 pm
by BlinkyBill
I think thats because Barra is content in his skill set. If you look at the lap by lap times, Barra and Jenson seem to finish their testing programs, Barra has a cold beer

- and good on him for it - while Jenson says . . . empty the car of fuel - raise the revs, let me have a crack at a fast lap.
Things would be different if Barra had wanted to have a crack at a fast lap.

But he doesnt need to show off. He doesnt have an image problem.
I am looking forward to Bahrain . . . all my theories will be proven true (except the one about starting cars in reverse . . . they are too scared to try that one

)
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 2:06 pm
by JayVee
BlinkyBill wrote:
I am looking forward to Bahrain . . . all my theories will be proven true (except the one about starting cars in reverse . . . they are too scared to try that one

)
I admire your confidence .... for the time being
After a few races though reality will start sinking in
.... and there is always next year

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 2:50 pm
by Kapel
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 3:04 pm
by Kapel
Hey Snowy,
How will Rubens a 9 time race winner challenge the might of a self proclaimed multiple world champion? Cant na.
Enjoy it till it lasts...

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 5:39 pm
by JayVee
Kapel wrote:JayVee wrote:

Are you implying that Michael is only sometimes a driver
That may explain everything then
JayVee,do u need to pick up words from different sentence to make a new sentence
You said:
Obviously JayVee,I'm biased for Rubens anyday against any driver in the world.

(Sometimes that includes Michael too)
Doesn't look like different sentences to me
Kapel wrote:
JayVee wrote:
Melb 98, that's 8 years ago. Even the tax office doesn't audit you for something that old
R u serious?? Damn,should think about moving to Australia then.
Maybe you should
Kapel wrote:JayVee wrote:
And they NEVER repeated it, in fact they PROVED a year later they don't have team orders unlike those repeat offenders
Its like saying,i will kill only the President of US & not his entire cabinet,so pardon me
In any system, first time offenders aren't punished as multiple offenders

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 5:49 pm
by Julian Mayo
in ANY system ? Try having an illicit liason once in some countries. Try running drugs for the first time in some countries. Ist time or not the penalty will be the same

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 6:07 pm
by JayVee
Julian Mayo wrote:in ANY system ? Try having an illicit liason once in some countries. Try running drugs for the first time in some countries. Ist time or not the penalty will be the same

It is way over the top from you and Kapel to compare unsporting behaviour with murder or drug smuggling.
If you compare it with unsporting behaviour in other sports, you will see that the first offence isn't punished as harshly as multiple offences.
If you don't believe that fine. I don't have to argue this point.
McLaren PROVED beyond any doubt that they don't apply team orders.
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 6:18 pm
by Julian Mayo
JV, you attack each and everyone of us if you feel we make inaccurate statements. I merely pointed out that i felt there may have been the tiniest inaccuracy in your post

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 6:26 pm
by Kapel
Kapel wrote:
Obviously JayVee,I'm biased for Rubens anyday against any driver in the world.

(Sometimes that includes Michael too)
How this sentence made u feel i said "Michael is sometimes a driver"???
JayVee wrote:

Are you implying that Michael is only sometimes a driver
That may explain everything then