Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 12:18 am
Yes.. 'tis probably but a figment of my over active imagination.



Welcome to NewsOnF1 Forums where you can chat about anything Formula 1
https://www.newsonf1.net/forum/
Good to have an active imaginationjacfan wrote:Yes.. 'tis probably but a figment of my over active imagination.![]()
But we have since made upjacfan wrote:Julian Mayo wrote:Why not?JayVee wrote:Faster cannot be based on a kart record in some place Julian.
Of course IMHO
Funny this looks to me IMHO like a direct reply to JayVee's post?????![]()
![]()
![]()
I will continue to post in all areas of the Forums, as requested.
If you feel that any part of any post is directed at you, or any part of of one of your posts, you will be mistaken.
If you feel that anything I post is in response to your posts, you will be in error.
If you expect to elicit a response from me, you will be wrong.
Should, for example, my post appear immediately below yours, that will be happenstance, and in no way to be taken in conjunction with your post.
I don't believe that I can make it clearer than that.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
very strange indeed.
I guess it is a moot point!gkaytaz wrote:DC had 5 retirements, 1 due to accident.JayVee wrote:
Look at those retirements, how many are mechanical and how many are accidents/spins ....
Again I am just stating those stats for accuracy of the comparison
MW had 11 retirements, 5 due to accident.
What I am saying is Webber had 6 races where he could have finished in the points against DC's 4 races. And since Webber has finished higher than DC when both drivers managed to finish, I believe that Webber would have had 6 opportunities to score additional 7 points.
Anyway it's a moot point since we'll soon see them racing side-by-side in the same vehicles.
Yes I know that I was just joshing with you both.JayVee wrote:But we have since made upjacfan wrote:Julian Mayo wrote:
Why not?
Funny this looks to me IMHO like a direct reply to JayVee's post?????![]()
![]()
![]()
I will continue to post in all areas of the Forums, as requested.
If you feel that any part of any post is directed at you, or any part of of one of your posts, you will be mistaken.
If you feel that anything I post is in response to your posts, you will be in error.
If you expect to elicit a response from me, you will be wrong.
Should, for example, my post appear immediately below yours, that will be happenstance, and in no way to be taken in conjunction with your post.
I don't believe that I can make it clearer than that.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
very strange indeed.
![]()
Yesh!JayVee wrote:I guess it is a moot point!gkaytaz wrote:DC had 5 retirements, 1 due to accident.JayVee wrote:
Look at those retirements, how many are mechanical and how many are accidents/spins ....
Again I am just stating those stats for accuracy of the comparison
MW had 11 retirements, 5 due to accident.
What I am saying is Webber had 6 races where he could have finished in the points against DC's 4 races. And since Webber has finished higher than DC when both drivers managed to finish, I believe that Webber would have had 6 opportunities to score additional 7 points.
Anyway it's a moot point since we'll soon see them racing side-by-side in the same vehicles.
I think we agree that if Webber gets throught the 1st corner OK then he'll beat Coulthard easily
Snowy wrote:![]()
I shall attempt to restore a bit of order to this thread. Jenson is about to test at Valencia after Ruben's and James have done two days of testing. The best they could do was a whole second off the pace. Have they built another lemon? At this moment I fear the Honda team, I really do.
Try to take a "worldly" view of itjacfan wrote:Look forward to seeing that.
Ok I will do that. I will take your adviceJulian Mayo wrote:Try to take a "worldly" view of itjacfan wrote:Look forward to seeing that.