JayVee wrote:Redhead wrote:JayVee wrote:Ignoring shows weakeness
Have to disagree with you there JayVee, it takes all the strength I have to ignore most of your posts.
If you really beleive that, it's fine!
If I didnt beleive it why would I post it?
JayVee wrote:Redhead wrote:Sweet FA's drive was good but it will not go down in history, look at the lap times. Laps 1-17 sweet FA, Kimi and button were all running about the same pace, Lap 18 Kimi and Button pitted, sweet FA didnt, this is the main reason he was so far ahead. He built on it by lapping significantly faster for the next few laps until Kimi couldnt decide which way to look, but after the safety car period Button was going faster than sweet FA until the wheels came off.
Again it is you opinion, I think he performance was mega and will go down in history but neither can prove it. Only time will!
Actually I can prove it, in each of the first 17 laps before Kimi and Button pitted, Button was fastest 5 times, sweet FA was fastest 5 times and Kimi was fastest 7 times. After they pitted sweet FA was fastest for 6 laps until Kimi crashed. After the safety car, for the 21 laps until sweet FA went out button was fastest 15 times and sweet FA was fastest 6 times. These are facts not opinions and sweet FA does not stand out amongst them.
After the first lap sweet FA made up 9 positions, Shumi made up 7, is two places the difference between regenmeister and has-been?
The 30 second lead you trumpet was only due to the fact that Kimi and Button had pitted, if sweet FA hadnt been penalised and filled his tank up he would probably have been on a very similar strategy to the other two which would have resulted in him still being behind after the first round of stops.
JayVee wrote:Redhead wrote:JayVee wrote:He got penalised, end of story.
Jerez 97? Monaco 06?
Are you serious ? A brake test incident that occurs numerous times a year is compared to dirty tricks aimed at hampering others or winning a championship by any mean.
It seems that since you accept what your driver does and consider it normal, you are desparate to find any mistake by any other driver so you can say, see he did it as well. The tricks and favours your driver does and gets isn't normal and no other driver even comes close to that loser.
Get real Redhead and promote fair play..
Again here's a fact, it was more than just a brake test, as he went past DB on the pit straight he swerved in front of him. This probably occured at somewhere between 200 and 300 kmh. Not only is it a stupid thing to do you have to ask yourself why did he do it.
My point is simply that you expect us to accept that, "He got penalised, end of story." in this case, but in cases where MS has been penalised, as far as you are concerend it most definitely isnt the end of the story. Yes, the two cases I quoted were more serious transgressions, but so were the penalties applied in each case. The same system was operating in all these cases. Feel free to trot out the conspriacy theories here, but if I recall you were criticising someone else for trotting out conspiracy theories earlier.
JayVee wrote:Redhead wrote:So Schumi is a loser because he struggled during the race. You have obviously forgotten Hungaroring 2005 when sweet FA was LAPPED! Does that make him a loser in his WDC year? The winner of that race was driving a Mclaren, was probably about then FA got on the phone to Ron, and was clever enough to not do so on a phone Flavio had provided.
This is fun.
You either didn't read an earlier post on this or you chose to ignore it. I am not calling your driver a loser because he got lapped. I am calling him a loser because he doesn't accept responsibility for a mistake. When he got the penalty he tried to imply that it was Alonso's fault.
In the past whenever he is caught the first thing he does is deny, hence loser.
Yes Alonso was lapped and we all know the circumstances then, and your driver was lapped there in 2003 but being lapped doesn't make one a loser
You got me there, I did misread your post. You also called him a loser because he got angry with DC in the pits. Sweet FA gets angry at 250 kmh and he doesn't get called a loser, Schumi gets angry at 0kmh and does. Go figure.
Last I checked the world was still standing. Nevertheless, the numbers are quite interesting. MF1 does show some speed. Look at Button and Heidfeld's best times (them being #1 and #3)... Not even one whole second better than Albers'. Remember that all three were driving on mostly dry pavement toward the end of the race (Heidfeld was pushing it, as Barrichello was practically his shadow.) That roughly translates to the cars (Honda, BMW and MF1/Toyota) being quite close in terms of technical capability. Scott Speed was not far behind either. Driver consistency seems to be the issue here. Then again it must be a helluva lot easier to be consistent in a Renault or Ferrari.
