Round of Monaco (Lance maintains the lead!)

sgd · Post by **sgd** » Fri May 20, 2005 12:11 pm

8 'n' Pole Admin wrote:Interesting that despite Raikkonen recieving more points for Pole more players expect Alonso to win.

Support for Michael at this event dropped significantly from the last event. For a win 59% to just 16% while for Pole 43% to just 13%

Support for Kimi improved significantly. 8% to 34% for a win and 16% to 36% for Pole.

People is beginning to realize the reality!!!

But 13% for pole is still too much for that Pig...

(I mean the car, of course

no MS-MrCh))

...ferrari has no longer a dominant car (package)!!!

and those poor drivers without a dominant car can just do nothing... or almost nothing, they still can wait for it to rain...

JayVee · Post by **JayVee** » Fri May 20, 2005 3:16 pm

Good to see realistic numbers

You'll find people who will keep picking Michael in the hope that he'll come back. Slowly but surely they'll keep shrinking as they realise the main problem is Bridgestone and by the time Bridgestone fix the problem (i.e pull out

) Michael would have retired

Jim Watt · Post by **Jim Watt** » Sat May 21, 2005 1:07 am

Well "Jum", May I respectfully point out that even Schuey rates Mark above DC,?

[/quote]

Right you are Jay Vee. And everything the Schumacher releases for quotation is calculated, too --just like his driving. That's one of the reasons he is, shall we say, admired more than liked? And, for same reason, the schadenfreude has, of late, been so thick in F1. As to Mark, the jury's still out, isn't it?

Jim

lemon_martini2 · Post by **lemon_martini2** » Sat May 21, 2005 4:50 am

My email never arrived to me.I tried to submit on the site,but my comp's been playing up and it wouldn't let me.Now it's working again but tis too late alas.And where did my email go?

Julian Mayo · Post by **Julian Mayo** » Sat May 21, 2005 8:11 am

lemon_martini2 wrote:My email never arrived to me.I tried to submit on the site,but my comp's been playing up and it wouldn't let me.Now it's working again but tis too late alas.And where did my email go?

Emails do not arrive for people on the naughty stool

8 n Pole Admin · Post by **8 n Pole Admin** » Sat May 21, 2005 10:34 am

lemon_martini2 wrote:My email never arrived to me.I tried to submit on the site,but my comp's been playing up and it wouldn't let me.Now it's working again but tis too late alas.And where did my email go?

Sorry lemon_martini2, your picks for Monaco never arrived at this end. Your picks for Spain will be used.

If you are having trouble with either of the forms for any reason, just send me an email or a PM before the deadline.

You never know, your picks for Spain may do the job

Good luck

JayVee · Post by **JayVee** » Sat May 21, 2005 11:44 am

Jim Watt wrote:
julian may wrote:Well "Jum", May I respectfully point out that even Schuey rates Mark above DC,?
Right you are Jay Vee. And everything the Schumacher releases for quotation is calculated, too --just like his driving. That's one of the reasons he is, shall we say, admired more than liked? And, for same reason, the schadenfreude has, of late, been so thick in F1. As to Mark, the jury's still out, isn't it?

Jim

Sorry Jim but it wasn't me who quoted Schumacher, it was julian.

I don't like quoting people I don't like

But if you ask me the question then yes I would say Webber is faster than Coulthard. I can't say Webber is more consistent though. Actually very few would be more consistent than Coulthard.

Julian Mayo · Post by **Julian Mayo** » Sat May 21, 2005 12:12 pm

JayVee wrote:
Jim Watt wrote:
julian may wrote:Well "Jum", May I respectfully point out that even Schuey rates Mark above DC,?
Right you are Jay Vee. And everything the Schumacher releases for quotation is calculated, too --just like his driving. That's one of the reasons he is, shall we say, admired more than liked? And, for same reason, the schadenfreude has, of late, been so thick in F1. As to Mark, the jury's still out, isn't it?

Jim
Sorry Jim but it wasn't me who quoted Schumacher, it was julian.

I don't like quoting people I don't like

But if you ask me the question then yes I would say Webber is faster than Coulthard. I can't say Webber is more consistent though. Actually very few would be more consistent than Coulthard.

Tis my personal, humble,respectful, opinion that Webber is more consistant, consistantly,but ,unfortunately, the williams is consistantly inconsistant, except for going backwards from Qualifying, at which it is amazingly consistant , consistantly so

lemon_martini2 · Post by **lemon_martini2** » Sat May 21, 2005 7:24 pm

Hang on.....what am I on the naughty stool for?

Julian Mayo · Post by **Julian Mayo** » Sat May 21, 2005 7:36 pm

lemon_martini2 wrote:Hang on.....what am I on the naughty stool for?

chauvinism

Julian Mayo · Post by **Julian Mayo** » Sat May 21, 2005 7:37 pm

julian mayo wrote:
lemon_martini2 wrote:Hang on.....what am I on the naughty stool for?
chauvinism

Being politically incorrect

Julian Mayo · Post by **Julian Mayo** » Sat May 21, 2005 7:39 pm

julian mayo wrote:
julian mayo wrote:
lemon_martini2 wrote:Hang on.....what am I on the naughty stool for?
chauvinism
Being politically incorrect

Being a bloke
Hi ho and off to Tilbury.... off with his head...nay off with both his heads

lemon_martini2 · Post by **lemon_martini2** » Sun May 22, 2005 3:51 am

I'm not chauvinistic. Women can perform a variety of useful and skilful jobs...
like...

*washing up,ironing,making the beds,cooking,cleaning

Kapel · Post by **Kapel** » Tue May 24, 2005 8:10 pm

Hey Ed,

Where are the results

I know i didnt do too well though:(

8 n Pole Admin · Post by **8 n Pole Admin** » Tue May 24, 2005 9:11 pm

Results tomorrow at the latest.

As Europe is this coming weekend it gets a bit of priority