Which Team on Which Tyre?? in 2006

F1greyhound · Post by **F1greyhound** » Wed Sep 14, 2005 7:37 pm

If we could get back on the topic, who will have which tyres next year?

Is the following list correct?:

MCLAREN-M
RENAULT-M
FERRARI-B
TOYOTA-B
WILLIAMS-B
BAR-M
REDBULL-M
SAUBER-M
JORDAN-B
RBJUNIOR-B

That would mean, 5 each, with BRIDGESTONE gaining support from 2 midfield teams and still having the 2 slowest packages while MICHELIN keeps the 2 best teams of this year plus another reasonable 3....

rah · Post by **rah** » Thu Sep 15, 2005 1:25 am

julian mayo wrote:
JayVee wrote:
julian mayo wrote: JV, I mean this sincerely. I find it a tragedy that Ferrari, and Michael were unable to mount a challenge this season. I believe a major reason for this was Bridgestone tyres. I would have loved to see Michael beaten on equal terms. As it is he can blame his poor showing on a component supplier. For this reason, yes I hope Webber will dare better on Bridgestones, and I hope every other driver has equal tyres, regardless of the brand.
Equal terms So a Ferrari is equal to a McLaren or a Renault if they are on the same tyres

Michael accepting blame, nah, he would have then blamed the engine or the chassis
JV, for goodness sake read what I post! Then do not put your own spin on it! Did I say ferrari would have been equal....NO! I said.. " a major reason"..no more and no less. Or are you in a contentious mood and determined to bicker and argue for the sake of doing so
If so I would be delighted to give you the phone number of the Ex- Mrs Mayo.

LMAO

Ed · Post by Ed » Thu Sep 15, 2005 9:57 am

F1greyhound wrote:If we could get back on the topic, who will have which tyres next year?

Is the following list correct?:

MCLAREN-M
RENAULT-M
FERRARI-B
TOYOTA-B
WILLIAMS-B
BAR-M
REDBULL-M
SAUBER-M
JORDAN-B
RBJUNIOR-B

That would mean, 5 each, with BRIDGESTONE gaining support from 2 midfield teams and still having the 2 slowest packages while MICHELIN keeps the 2 best teams of this year plus another reasonable 3....

Yes it appears that way however many teams have yet to confirm.

JayVee · Post by **JayVee** » Thu Sep 15, 2005 4:39 pm

julian mayo wrote:
julian mayo wrote: JV, I mean this sincerely. I find it a tragedy that Ferrari, and Michael were unable to mount a challenge this season. I believe a major reason for this was Bridgestone tyres. I would have loved to see Michael beaten on equal terms. As it is he can blame his poor showing on a component supplier. For this reason, yes I hope Webber will dare better on Bridgestones, and I hope every other driver has equal tyres, regardless of the brand.
JV, for goodness sake read what I post! Then do not put your own spin on it! Did I say ferrari would have been equal....NO! I said.. " a major reason"..no more and no less. Or are you in a contentious mood and determined to bicker and argue for the sake of doing so
If so I would be delighted to give you the phone number of the Ex- Mrs Mayo.

Without getting Ex-Mrs Mayo involved, for goodness sake read what you post

stiffpaper · Post by **stiffpaper** » Thu Sep 15, 2005 4:51 pm

ok... the one tyre thingy.. i guess it will cut costs for the teams... but there wont be as much excitement...

we can see past the endurance of the tyre manufactures and can compare.. if everything is so standardized ; everyone using bridgestone... where is the FUN?

with different types of tyres.. teams will have the liberty to choose and decide the best for the team...

Julian Mayo · Post by **Julian Mayo** » Thu Sep 15, 2005 4:57 pm

JayVee wrote:
julian mayo wrote:
julian mayo wrote: JV, I mean this sincerely. I find it a tragedy that Ferrari, and Michael were unable to mount a challenge this season. I believe a major reason for this was Bridgestone tyres. I would have loved to see Michael beaten on equal terms. As it is he can blame his poor showing on a component supplier. For this reason, yes I hope Webber will dare better on Bridgestones, and I hope every other driver has equal tyres, regardless of the brand.
JV, for goodness sake read what I post! Then do not put your own spin on it! Did I say ferrari would have been equal....NO! I said.. " a major reason"..no more and no less. Or are you in a contentious mood and determined to bicker and argue for the sake of doing so
If so I would be delighted to give you the phone number of the Ex- Mrs Mayo.
Without getting Ex-Mrs Mayo involved, for goodness sake read what you post

pong

Julian Mayo · Post by **Julian Mayo** » Thu Sep 15, 2005 5:03 pm

JV are you at all capable of reading something in context, and leaving it in context, when you reply to a post. As far as I know I write with sufficient eloquence for most people to understand exactly what is printed. If on the other hand you are determined to take one sentence from its contextual position, arraign it with another sentence, plucked also from within its context, simply to nitppick, argue, and generally detract from the overall decorum of the thread I must insist on you having the Ex's ph no.,post haste.

JayVee · Post by **JayVee** » Thu Sep 15, 2005 5:44 pm

julian mayo wrote:JV are you at all capable of reading something in context, and leaving it in context, when you reply to a post. As far as I know I write with sufficient eloquence for most people to understand exactly what is printed. If on the other hand you are determined to take one sentence from its contextual position, arraign it with another sentence, plucked also from within its context, simply to nitppick, argue, and generally detract from the overall decorum of the thread I must insist on you having the Ex's ph no.,post haste.

You can keep trying distracting me but that won't work.

Get back to the point and so that you don't go on and on about me taking your comments out of context, can you please tell me what you meant by equal terms when you said "I would have loved to see Michael beaten on equal terms"

Oh and just in case you go off on a different tangent, the topic is about tyres

JayVee · Post by **JayVee** » Thu Sep 15, 2005 5:46 pm

stiffpaper wrote:ok... the one tyre thingy.. i guess it will cut costs for the teams... but there wont be as much excitement...

we can see past the endurance of the tyre manufactures and can compare.. if everything is so standardized ; everyone using bridgestone... where is the FUN?

with different types of tyres.. teams will have the liberty to choose and decide the best for the team...

Julian Mayo · Post by **Julian Mayo** » Thu Sep 15, 2005 6:04 pm

JayVee wrote:
julian mayo wrote:JV are you at all capable of reading something in context, and leaving it in context, when you reply to a post. As far as I know I write with sufficient eloquence for most people to understand exactly what is printed. If on the other hand you are determined to take one sentence from its contextual position, arraign it with another sentence, plucked also from within its context, simply to nitppick, argue, and generally detract from the overall decorum of the thread I must insist on you having the Ex's ph no.,post haste.
You can keep trying distracting me but that won't work.

Get back to the point and so that you don't go on and on about me taking your comments out of context, can you please tell me what you meant by equal terms when you said "I would have loved to see Michael beaten on equal terms"

Oh and just in case you go off on a different tangent, the topic is about tyres

sigh, I w i l l p r i n t v e r y s l o w l y.. on tyres of equal use as anybody elses...if you go back to my original point AND leave it in bloody context, I prefer one control tyre BECAUSE if we had had that this season Michael would have no excuse. That is not the only reason, but lets, if you must, go over them one at a time