BAR Penalty - Your Thoughts

Discuss all the aspects of the Formula 1 sport here

Moderators: cmlean, Ed, The Qualiflyer, The Heretic

Was the BAR penalty

Too Harsh
7
50%
Fair
4
29%
Too Lenient
3
21%
 
Total votes: 14

Kapel
2004 Champ
2004 Champ
Posts: 2778
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: India

Post by Kapel » Wed May 11, 2005 10:09 pm

BAR has released a statement that 6 out of the "group of nine" ran a similar kinda fuel tank which were termed illegal and considered the BAR Honda cars underweight. :shock: :shock: :shock:

The stewards i guess didnt check the other teams or mayb cos their informer only informed them about BAR's :wink:

Imagine nearly the entire grid being banned for 2 races :shock: :shock:
An F1 Idiot!!!

Ed
NewsOnF1 Editor
NewsOnF1 Editor
Posts: 22255
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 1:24 pm

Post by Ed » Thu May 12, 2005 1:06 am

Kapel,

The fuel tank BAR runs is not illegal.

Running a similar fuel system doesn't automatically mean that a car is illegal. As long as the car is above the minimum weight (without fuel) then it is legal. (According to the latest ruling by the Court of Appeal)

We don't know if others at San Marino were underweight and we'll never know but for sure no one would have been at Spain

<T-K>
F1 Race Winner
F1 Race Winner
Posts: 2604
Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 4:54 am

Too Harsh on BAR

Post by <T-K> » Thu May 12, 2005 5:19 am

I dont think that bar should have been penalized like that......i mean, their car was still above the weight limit when it finished, so therefore there was no advantage, if they had been running without the extra fuel and found to be underweight, then fine...but they weighed the same as the other cars at the finish.........therefore, i dont think they should have been penalized.....specially poor Sato

sgd
Racer
Racer
Posts: 971
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 8:16 am
Location: SoL III
Contact:

Re: Too Harsh on BAR

Post by sgd » Thu May 12, 2005 5:31 am

<T-K> wrote:I dont think that bar should have been penalized like that......i mean, their car was still above the weight limit when it finished, so therefore there was no advantage, if they had been running without the extra fuel and found to be underweight, then fine...but they weighed the same as the other cars at the finish.........therefore, i dont think they should have been penalized.....specially poor Sato
:welcome:
the problem is not the weight at the finish, but the weight at every second of the race... they COULD be light just before each pit-stop...
there were a misinterpretation of the rules, of what could be used as ballast...

<T-K>
F1 Race Winner
F1 Race Winner
Posts: 2604
Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 4:54 am

Post by <T-K> » Thu May 12, 2005 7:00 am

but he didnt seem to have an advantage, the only time that button ever seemed fast was after his first stop......... I still think it was unfair.

sgd
Racer
Racer
Posts: 971
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 8:16 am
Location: SoL III
Contact:

Post by sgd » Thu May 12, 2005 9:25 am

<T-K> wrote:but he didnt seem to have an advantage...
that's not important to FIA...

btw, I think it was unfair too!!! :x

JayVee
F1 Race Winner
F1 Race Winner
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 12:17 am
Location: Somewhere left of the middle

Post by JayVee » Thu May 12, 2005 10:37 am

<T-K> wrote:but he didnt seem to have an advantage, the only time that button ever seemed fast was after his first stop......... I still think it was unfair.
The team proved that the weight of the car never dropped below 600kg at any stage. Still the FIA penalised them.

I am certain (IMHO) that the GPWC/FIA fight is a major reason why the penalty was so harsh.

Want me to go even further, well having one less competitive team out for 2 races could help a struggling team gain a bit of ground. (Again IMHO)
Luckily it didn't work in Spain and hopefully it won't in Monaco
I'm back and yes supporting Alonso "The Cute" in the Ferrari!

Julian Mayo
Forum Hall of Fame
Forum Hall of Fame
Posts: 15661
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 7:07 am
Location: Tying the antenna to the tallest tree I can find.

Post by Julian Mayo » Thu May 12, 2005 10:49 am

JayVee wrote:
<T-K> wrote:but he didnt seem to have an advantage, the only time that button ever seemed fast was after his first stop......... I still think it was unfair.
The team proved that the weight of the car never dropped below 600kg at any stage. Still the FIA penalised them.

I am certain (IMHO) that the GPWC/FIA fight is a major reason why the penalty was so harsh.

Want me to go even further, well having one less competitive team out for 2 races could help a struggling team gain a bit of ground. (Again IMHO)
Luckily it didn't work in Spain and hopefully it won't in Monaco

(IMHO)? :ROTFLMAO: :ROTFLMAO: :ROTFLMAO: :ROTFLMAO:
Apart from that eye-brow raiser you are on the money


:!: :!:
The Mountain is a savage Mistress.

JayVee
F1 Race Winner
F1 Race Winner
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 12:17 am
Location: Somewhere left of the middle

Post by JayVee » Thu May 12, 2005 10:52 am

julian mayo wrote:
(IMHO)? :ROTFLMAO: :ROTFLMAO: :ROTFLMAO: :ROTFLMAO:
Apart from that eye-brow raiser you are on the money


:!: :!:
Well I don't want to imply that I am stating a fact and make some people angry :shock:

Very logical but :shock: :shock:
I'm back and yes supporting Alonso "The Cute" in the Ferrari!

Julian Mayo
Forum Hall of Fame
Forum Hall of Fame
Posts: 15661
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 7:07 am
Location: Tying the antenna to the tallest tree I can find.

Post by Julian Mayo » Thu May 12, 2005 11:12 am

JayVee wrote:
julian mayo wrote:
(IMHO)? :ROTFLMAO: :ROTFLMAO: :ROTFLMAO: :ROTFLMAO:
Apart from that eye-brow raiser you are on the money


:!: :!:
Well I don't want to imply that I am stating a fact and make some people angry :shock:

Very logical but :shock: :shock:
Who's afraid of the big bad wolf, then? :rolling: :TOTW: :alright:
The Mountain is a savage Mistress.

F1greyhound
Over 500
Over 500
Posts: 507
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: Prague, CZ

Post by F1greyhound » Thu May 12, 2005 10:02 pm

Studying the BAR statement, the FIA penalty is absolutely wrong, not only from a sporting view. In BARs case I wouldnt hesitate for a fraction of a second to take legal action - would be surprised now, if they didnt.

K-D, sorry but you were wrong...
YOURS IN SPORT

Ed
NewsOnF1 Editor
NewsOnF1 Editor
Posts: 22255
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 1:24 pm

Post by Ed » Fri May 13, 2005 1:10 am

BAR Honda have issued a statement today in which the team recognised that it was understood by the other teams that an F1 car needs to be 600kg when completely empty of fuel.
B?A?R Honda now accept that Formula One cars must always weigh more than 600kg when completely empty of fuel and that this applies even if the car's fuel system is such that some of the fuel in the car is unusable.
It was the team's honest belief that fuel which could not be used during the race did not have to be removed before the car was weighed
The statement also accepted the FIA Court of Appeal decision and described it as fair
B?A?R Honda accept the decision of the FIA Court of Appeal as fair in the circumstances and recognise that the judges in this, as in other cases, are fully independent, being lawyers and professional judges of high standing who give their service on a voluntary basis
Full Statement

Kapel
2004 Champ
2004 Champ
Posts: 2778
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: India

Post by Kapel » Fri May 13, 2005 7:36 pm

After Reading these comments for BAR,do one actually feel that they misintrepeted the rules??? :shock: :shock: I doubt it though,mayb they were exploiting the rules.

Or are these statements made in some kinda pressure from FIA??? :?
An F1 Idiot!!!

JayVee
F1 Race Winner
F1 Race Winner
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 12:17 am
Location: Somewhere left of the middle

Post by JayVee » Fri May 13, 2005 10:29 pm

By the sound of it, it looks like Honda got a very serious warning behind the scenes from someone very high at the FIA

I am starting to doubt that GPWC will actually eventuate. I hope it does but if teams like Honda do such a backflip, I can imagine all of them signing a new Concorde agreement very soon!

I think there is simply too much money involved to risk being expelled

Sad reliality
I'm back and yes supporting Alonso "The Cute" in the Ferrari!

Julian Mayo
Forum Hall of Fame
Forum Hall of Fame
Posts: 15661
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 7:07 am
Location: Tying the antenna to the tallest tree I can find.

Post by Julian Mayo » Fri May 13, 2005 10:31 pm

JayVee wrote:
Sad reliality
8)
The Mountain is a savage Mistress.

Post Reply